I am writing in response to the article on the “giant pumpkin” on Route 212. Specifically in relation to microplastics. Although I understand the point of the article was human interest, not science, it seems a glaring omission to ignore this subject especially after reading these sentences:

“Everybody thought it was the garlic clove for the Garlic Fest,” he said, laughing. “But ultraviolet light breaks down the spray foam. Within a year or two it got that nice orange patina. There’s no paint on that, that’s its natural color.”     

Spray foam breakdown is environmentally harmful because it is not biodegradable, leading to landfill waste and microplastic pollution.

The microplastic problem is certainly worth an article in the future, is it not? It is part of every community now all over the world and providing information to readers is one tool for awareness. From giant pumpkins, to prayer flags, awareness is all we have at this point.

Thank you.

Janet Villani

Shady, New York


"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Have a tip for a story or an issue in your community? See something happening we should know about? Let us know!

Noah has written for The New York Times, Vogue, Semafor, Variety, The Guardian, Fast Company, and other international, national, and regional outlets. He studied at Columbia University and holds a bachelor's...